what's funny, is when this story hit the morning national news a couple weeks ago, followed by the local news an hour later, both immediately followed the headline' with the vax not being a contributor since a couple of unvaxxed kids were suffering this as well... the important question they left out was if thee kids were born to vaxxed parents; i.e., was the child exposed to vax whilst unborn or was there a spike shed etc etc. it's odd when the 'news' immediate argues a point before anyone brings it up!
The article really doesn't say the exact ages, so we don't know how many are infants. It does say "under 16" so there's a chance they could have their shots, and I'm sure there were some parents out there hysterically begging a doctor to shoot up their young'uns.
True. The headlines didn't specify age either, just left it ambiguous to suggest pre-pubescent... there is no reason anyone in these age ranges should be needed a liver transplant let alone en-masse. Somethings a foot
That's the biggest problem with this. How are children getting hepatitis to the point where it's late stage, liver destroyed?
(post is archived)