The "vaccines" designated as being for the supposed SARS-CoV-2 jewflu are not vaccines. Calling them such only reinforces the jews' narrative that they are pushing. Even "gene therapy" is inaccurate as they are not only not curing any illnesses, but are actually inducing malady and priming the body to have a greatly enhanced negative reaction when certain illnesses are encountered. It also isn't a "medical device", but either that or 'gene therapy' are closer to accurate than the blatantly unsuitable and maliciously used term "vaccine". If one still refers to them as "vaccines" after being informed of their nature as not meeting the definition or requirements to be a "vaccine", I presume that they are willingly involved in perpetuating the lie and reinforcing the narrative and thus they show that they support the enemy. One should choose their words wisely as they reflect which side of this war they've chosen to be on. Fatal and non-fatal reaction statistics reported at VAERS also only comprise about 1% of the actual events as hospitals are not required to report these events and reporting is entirely voluntary. Studies have been conducted regarding VAERS and the percentage of events that actually get reported to them and they have shown that only about 1% of events actually do get reported. Additionally, a percentage of those reports are also made by patients themselves or family of patients as the doctors refuse to report the events. Why would they refuse to report the events? Because reporting them could negatively affect the doctor and their career as well as the hospital itself and their funding. It could even potentially leave the hospital and the doctor open to lawsuits if malpractice is believed to have occurred. Even if one were to assume the percentage of instances being reported would be increased unusually due to the attention these injections are receiving, it is not logical to believe it might increase any higher than 10% of events being reported, let alone to an absurdly improbable 100%. Actually, percentage of events being reported increasing is highly unlikely as reporting is counter to the doctor and the hospital's own interest and it would likely decrease to a fraction of 1%. So whatever the reported fatal and non-fatal reactions are, multiply that number by 90 if you believe it is up to 10% being reported, or multiply by 99 or 99.5 if you believe the percentage of events being reported stayed the same or even decreased by half. This would allow you to get a more accurate statistic of how many actual fatal and non-fatal reactions there have been. If events voluntarily being reported increased from 1% to 10% - 271 * 90 = 24,390 fatal reactions - 10,000 * 90 = 900,000 non-fatal reactions If events voluntarily being reported stayed the same at 1% - 271 * 99 = 26,829 fatal reactions - 10,000 * 99 = 990,000 non-fatal reactions If events voluntarily being reported decreased by half from 1% to 0.5% - 271 * 99.5 = 26,965 (rounded) fatal reactions - 10,000 * 99.5 = 995,000 non-fatal reactions So fatal reactions in the US is actually between 24,000 and 27,000, and non-fatal reactions between 900,000 and 1,000,000. I had seen it reported that 31,000,000 'doses' have supposedly been administered across the US so far not too long ago, so it is possibly up to 3.3% of the individuals who received it who experienced a fatal or non-fatal negative reaction to it (1,027,000 / 31,000,000 = 0.033 = 3.3%).