climate change?
climate change?
Source: https://openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health
We don't know, but we know it isn't the life saving vax, no matter how much the data correlates. Truely baffling.
We don't know, but we know it isn't the life saving vax, no matter how much the data correlates. Truely baffling.
White supremacy must be the cause as per FJB
White supremacy must be the cause as per FJB
'Hurr durr. Muh correlation is not causation - get boosted faggots !!' Every single big tech social media comment section.
'Hurr durr. Muh correlation is not causation - *get boosted faggots* !!' Every single big tech social media comment section.
Must be do to climate change. Maybe even taking too many breaths per day.
Must be do to climate change. Maybe even taking too many breaths per day.
Worth noting this seems to be specifically pulled from VAERS data. Obviously a kind of self-reporting bias could play into this.
It's obvious the vaccine causes miscarriages, but citing data like this to advance the awareness of it actually does a disservice to the cause imo.
Worth noting this seems to be specifically pulled from VAERS data. Obviously a kind of self-reporting bias could play into this.
It's obvious the vaccine causes miscarriages, but citing data like this to advance the awareness of it actually does a disservice to the cause imo.
it actually does a disservice to the cause imo.
What disservice does it do to point at a specific time date?
> it actually does a disservice to the cause imo.
What disservice does it do to point at a specific time date?
What disservice does it do to point at a specific time date?
The disservice is presenting data that are easy to dismiss. It's self-reported (probably by women lol) and therefore, as much as I agree with the conclusion it supports, the reporting is subject to hype and the fears of the people reporting it.
I'm sure data are available from doctors and hospitals that support the same conclusion (which is already obvious given how we know spike proteins accumulate in the ovaries and how menstrual changes are a well-known side effect of the clot shot) but are more likely to mean something.
>What disservice does it do to point at a specific time date?
The disservice is presenting data that are easy to dismiss. It's self-reported (probably by women lol) and therefore, as much as I agree with the conclusion it supports, the reporting is subject to hype and the fears of the people reporting it.
I'm sure data are available from doctors and hospitals that support the same conclusion (which is already obvious given how we know spike proteins accumulate in the ovaries and how menstrual changes are a well-known side effect of the clot shot) but are more likely to mean something.
The disservice is presenting data that are easy to dismiss.
How?
> The disservice is presenting data that are easy to dismiss.
How?
Dude, even their own peer reviewed studies show that VAERS is under reported by at least 100 fold.
Dude, even their own peer reviewed studies show that VAERS is under reported by at least 100 fold.
(post is archived)