Archived links:
https://archive.ph/52nTu
https://web.archive.org/web/20230526042817/https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-simplest-way-to-prove-vaccines
An even simpler way -
An even simpler way - [the Amish](https://unofficialbird.com/stkirsch/status/1661537057208926210)
https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/1660769433856638976
I just realized my comment and yours hits on covid deaths, not autism caused by the vax. I don't know the rate of autism in the Amish but my gut tells me it would reflect autism levels similar to America in the 1920s - pre vax history.
I just realized my comment and yours hits on covid deaths, not autism caused by the vax. I don't know the rate of autism in the Amish but my gut tells me it would reflect autism levels similar to America in the 1920s - pre vax history.
>https://amishamerica.com/amish_autism/
>https://goodmenproject.com/arts/trace-amounts-film-review/
You could claim the timing is a confounding variable since vaccine are so rigorously scheduled. Perhaps a developmental period where autism symptoms begin to show overlaps with the time that, say, the MMR vaccine is scheduled (first shot typically given when 12-15 months old).
You could compare vaccine/autism symptoms timing just for children who were vaccinated on an alternative schedule. The only problem you might run into is if later vaccination actually reduces the risk for vaccine-induced autism for certain shots.
Shouldn't we be asking these people to prove the benefit of these vaccines though? Does the MMR shot at 12-15 months age actually reduce outbreaks of measles and is it necessary/desirable to reduce these outbreaks?
Why aren't they being asked to prove that? If they claim to know this, I want to see the receipts.
You could claim the timing is a confounding variable since vaccine are so rigorously scheduled. Perhaps a developmental period where autism symptoms begin to show overlaps with the time that, say, the MMR vaccine is scheduled (first shot typically given when 12-15 months old).
You could compare vaccine/autism symptoms timing just for children who were vaccinated on an alternative schedule. The only problem you might run into is if later vaccination actually reduces the risk for vaccine-induced autism for certain shots.
Shouldn't we be asking these people to prove the *benefit* of these vaccines though? Does the MMR shot at 12-15 months age actually reduce outbreaks of measles and is it necessary/desirable to reduce these outbreaks?
Why aren't they being asked to prove that? If they claim to know this, I want to see the receipts.
It's considered unethical (and actually unlawful) to purposely expose a healthy individual to an illness/ pathogen etc. so they simply give what ever nonsense vaccine and then 'study' if someone gets target illness. In the cases of people already exposed - they 'study' them recovering after giving the vaccine and insist any benefit is vaxx related.
It's all bait and switch and depending on study parameters and how the data is collated and presented - anything can become anything.
It's considered unethical (and actually unlawful) to purposely expose a healthy individual to an illness/ pathogen etc. so they simply give what ever nonsense vaccine and then 'study' if someone gets target illness.
In the cases of people already exposed - they 'study' them recovering after giving the vaccine and insist any benefit is vaxx related.
It's all bait and switch and depending on study parameters and how the data is collated and presented - anything can become anything.
I'm willing to bet $5M that vaccines cause autism.
I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is that vaccines cause autism. Is there anyone confident that I'm wrong? This is easy money.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/im-willing-to-bet-5m-that-vaccines
**I'm willing to bet $5M that vaccines cause autism.**
I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is that vaccines cause autism. Is there anyone confident that I'm wrong? This is easy money.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/im-willing-to-bet-5m-that-vaccines
People need to learn to stop doing that. There will always be a corrupt judge that says the plaintiff proved vaccines don't cause autism and force you to pay $5m to some idiot with 'science' on his side.
People need to learn to stop doing that. There will always be a corrupt judge that says the plaintiff proved vaccines don't cause autism and force you to pay $5m to some idiot with 'science' on his side.
Example: https://pic8.co/sh/3aWnlH.png
Offered 50k for proof holocaust gas chambers used to murder kikes. Judge awarded jew to be paid the 50k without providing the proof that was needed as the event happening as they say it did is "beyond question" and facts and proof it happened are not needed.
And related: https://pic8.co/sh/cx2njM.jpg
Example: https://pic8.co/sh/3aWnlH.png
Offered 50k for proof holocaust gas chambers used to murder kikes.
Judge awarded jew to be paid the 50k without providing the proof that was needed as the event happening as they say it did is "beyond question" and facts and proof it happened are not needed.
And related: https://pic8.co/sh/cx2njM.jpg
1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT http://whale.to/c/olmsted_on_autism1979.html https://www.ageofautism.com/files/wyeth79.pdf
1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT
http://whale.to/c/olmsted_on_autism1979.html
https://www.ageofautism.com/files/wyeth79.pdf
Excellent
Excellent
That's actually not that simple. If kids begin to exhibit symptoms of autism at a certain age, and that age also corresponds to when a child is vaccinated there will be a strong correlation, but no causation.
An example would be, "if kids start growing teeth right after they are vaccinated, does that mean that the vaccine cause tooth growth?"
That's actually not that simple. If kids begin to exhibit symptoms of autism at a certain age, and that age also corresponds to when a child is vaccinated there will be a strong correlation, but no causation.
An example would be, "if kids start growing teeth right after they are vaccinated, does that mean that the vaccine cause tooth growth?"
Also count the amount of kids and teenagers in perfect health who were forcefully poisoned and now are dropping like flies from heart attacks.
I'm nearly 31, never vaccinated, never wore a mask and worked in public the entire time. I liked the empty office space. I didn't even really do much work since even the boss was hiding and afraid of the 12000th new variant of the common cold and flu. 3 years of chaos to make some elites billionaires, cause fear and rig some elections.
Weird. I must be superhuman.
Also count the amount of kids and teenagers in perfect health who were forcefully poisoned and now are dropping like flies from heart attacks.
I'm nearly 31, never vaccinated, never wore a mask and worked in public the entire time. I liked the empty office space. I didn't even really do much work since even the boss was hiding and afraid of the 12000th new variant of the common cold and flu. 3 years of chaos to make some elites billionaires, cause fear and rig some elections.
Weird. I must be superhuman.
What about the Danish longitudinal studies where millions of kids were vaccinated, millions were not, and there was no statistically significant difference in autism rates?
What about the Danish longitudinal studies where millions of kids were vaccinated, millions were not, and there was no statistically significant difference in autism rates?
Depends on the study parameters, how the data is collated and presented, and were the numbers adjusted or unadjusted. Not saying the result is incorrect, but details are important.
Also What longitudinal study has 'millions of unvaccinated kids' - are these Western kids or third world kids ?/.
Depends on the study parameters, how the data is collated and presented, and were the numbers adjusted or unadjusted. Not saying the result is incorrect, but details are important.
Also What longitudinal study has 'millions of unvaccinated kids' - are these Western kids or third world kids ?/.
If you want to look for probable causes of autism, go look at geriatric mothers yeeting their unloved children into daycare and public school gulags. The data doesnt support it being vaccines.
This is it: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1124634/#:~:text=The%20authors%20found%20that%20%E2%80%9CThere,relative%20risk%20of%20other%20autistic%2D
If you want to look for probable causes of autism, go look at geriatric mothers yeeting their unloved children into daycare and public school gulags. The data doesnt support it being vaccines.
Ok thanks, Btw, It wasn't 'millions of children' . It was slightly over 500 000 (which incl almost 100 000 non vaccinated in that number).
The highlighted segment in your link, details what Studies Author's say they found, describing the findings as - 'adjusted relative risk of autistic disorder'. I almost knew before reading this would be how they categorized the results.
My question is ''What is the (unadjusted) absolute risk of autistic disorder?'' and curious why not show the 'absolute risk of spectrum disorder' from MMR vaccination. Eg, 'relative risk' to what - Not getting the MMR ? - then why not show the 'absolute risk'.
As we saw all throughout the convid19 reporting of data - using 'adjusted relative risk ' is simply a slight of hand way to game data by both either over stating or understating depending on what outcome you desire, and 'misinterpret' absolute risk.
Had a similar issue with the phizzer vaxx shill dadudemon1 - always posting links to big pharma/msm 'adjusted relative risk snapshot data' for why convid19 was deadly and everyone was gonna die unless you got their clot shot.
Ok thanks, Btw, It wasn't 'millions of children' . It was slightly over 500 000 (which incl almost 100 000 non vaccinated in that number).
The highlighted segment in your link, details what Studies Author's say they found, describing the findings as - 'adjusted relative risk of autistic disorder'. I almost knew before reading this would be how they categorized the results.
My question is ''What is the (unadjusted) absolute risk of autistic disorder?'' and curious why not show the 'absolute risk of spectrum disorder' from MMR vaccination. Eg, 'relative risk' to what - Not getting the MMR ? - then why not show the 'absolute risk'.
As we saw all throughout the convid19 reporting of data - using 'adjusted relative risk ' is simply a slight of hand way to game data by both either over stating or understating depending on what outcome you desire, and 'misinterpret' absolute risk.
Had a similar issue with the phizzer vaxx shill dadudemon1 - always posting links to big pharma/msm 'adjusted relative risk snapshot data' for why convid19 was deadly and everyone was gonna die unless you got their clot shot.
Twatter bots / npcs bombed his poll yesterday and twisted the count from like 5:1 one week after, to 2:1 one week before. Lol.
Twatter bots / npcs bombed his poll yesterday and twisted the count from like 5:1 one week after, to 2:1 one week before. Lol.
(post is archived)