WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Media bullshit. Participants had underlying issues. Media trying to find a scapegoat in erythritol, to cover up for injection related heart attacks.

Media bullshit. Participants had underlying issues. Media trying to find a scapegoat in erythritol, to cover up for injection related heart attacks.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I also wonder if there's a secondary motive to remove easy market access to erithrytol. It's easily transformed into an explosive that you don't even have to have your Grade 10 to make if ever needed.

[–] 1 pt

allowed in food since 1999 but only since after the pfizer vaxx has it started killing people.

[–] 0 pt

People are going to have to become at least skilled amateurs at reading and understanding scientific research papers, particularly the methods sections. We are likely going to see a mountain of horribly flawed "science" put out to try and cover up the millions and millions of deaths that are being caused by the jab.

The vast majority of the unthinking masses will lap up "The Science" and what ever sound bite the MSM grab from the abstract of these studies, or event the press release about them. But it will be up to the few who are able to read and analyse such studies to point out their flaws.

The one that pisses me off at the moment is the study purporting to show that myocarditis is more prevalent due to COVID than from the jab. That study is so methodologically flawed that it cannot be an accident. It also passed through peer (pal) review with such glaring flaws. In that study, they looked at the rate of myocarditis in people who had COVID and sought medical treatment, then compared that with the rate of ALL people who got the jab. The confounding between those two cohorts is just astounding. You cannot compare those rates at all. Yet, that fraudulent research is repeated in the media and by politicians pushing the jabs even to this day.