Gmo's by themselves aren't bad.
The problem is, gmo's can take a fuckton more roundup before the plant itself would die.
The farmer can then use huge huge huge amounts of roundup that become a cancer causing item in the consumer of said plant.
So gmo's don't cause cancer, they just pass on the poison to the consumer.
Gmo's by themselves aren't bad.
The problem is, gmo's can take a fuckton more roundup before the plant itself would die.
The farmer can then use huge huge huge amounts of roundup that become a cancer causing item in the consumer of said plant.
So gmo's don't cause cancer, they just pass on the poison to the consumer.
GMOs are inherently a monoculture, so in that regard they are bad. One type of famine and it could completely destroy all of that type of GMO crop.
GMOs are inherently a monoculture, so in that regard they are bad. One type of famine and it could completely destroy all of that type of GMO crop.
There is that, but that is a danger or a risk, not inherently repeatable and proveablely bad as the toxic levels of cancer causing roundup consumers
There is that, but that is a danger or a risk, not inherently repeatable and proveablely bad as the toxic levels of cancer causing roundup consumers
(post is archived)