OY VEY GOY IT'S NOT THE VAXX!
#OY VEY GOY IT'S NOT THE VAXX!
Lord have mercy, Your blood pressure is rising Higher higher Don't blame the Vax not cool
Girl, girl, girl, girl Get your defibrillator You brain is spiked With lots of extra proteins
Your doctors did conspire With governments and higher You took it voluntary (((Approved))) drugs
Lord have mercy,
Your blood pressure is rising
Higher higher
Don't blame the Vax not cool
Girl, girl, girl, girl
Get your defibrillator
You brain is spiked
With lots of extra proteins
Your doctors did conspire
With governments and higher
You took it voluntary
(((Approved))) drugs
Family blood is best blood, I dip my sisters tampons in hot water for tea.
Family blood is best blood, I dip my sisters tampons in hot water for tea.
Inbreeding is historically somewhat common the further back in time you go. Historically second cousins and further is socially acceptable. The change in more modern times is driven by safe travel in timely manner. Historically your mate would live within 25 miles of you. And families tended to regionally stay closer together. The result is some degree of distant inbreeding has always existed in most families. Not to mention, family trees were of course observed to ensure repeated close breeding did not occur (second cousins on both sides and or repeating the next generation).
None of this compares to what occurred in many royal lines, whereby father/daughter, mother/son, first cousins, and so on, were much more common with all of the expected genetic disorders associated with this type of selection.
None of this is an endorsement of this practice on my part. Simply a historical explanation of what is both documented in registered family trees online and what genetics have confirmed. Which also confirms, as you go further back in time, roughly 20% of the men mated with 80% of the women. Which suddenly makes it understandable why raiding and raping and pillaging was historically popular across tribal lines.
Inbreeding is historically somewhat common the further back in time you go. Historically second cousins and further is socially acceptable. The change in more modern times is driven by safe travel in timely manner. Historically your mate would live within 25 miles of you. And families tended to regionally stay closer together. The result is some degree of distant inbreeding has always existed in most families. Not to mention, family trees were of course observed to ensure repeated close breeding did not occur (second cousins on both sides and or repeating the next generation).
None of this compares to what occurred in many royal lines, whereby father/daughter, mother/son, first cousins, and so on, were much more common with all of the expected genetic disorders associated with this type of selection.
None of this is an endorsement of this practice on my part. Simply a historical explanation of what is both documented in registered family trees online and what genetics have confirmed. Which also confirms, as you go further back in time, roughly 20% of the men mated with 80% of the women. Which suddenly makes it understandable why raiding and raping and pillaging was historically popular across tribal lines.
(post is archived)