Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

824

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

Genesis 3

Then the LORD God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”

“The serpent deceived me,” she replied, “and I ate.”

... To the woman He said:

“I will sharply increase your pain in childbirth; in pain you will bring forth children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”

(Seems like as good an explanation as any)

[–] • 2 pts

I always get a kick out of the new dumbed down translations of the Bible. But you’re right nonetheless

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

I always get a kick out of the new dumbed down translations of the Bible. But you’re right nonetheless

The claim is that these versions are carefully translated from the original texts into modern English, without all the flourish, and eliminating archaic words like thee, dost and hath. Not necessarily 'dumbed down,' just more readable.

The message seems to be the same.

[–] • 3 pts

The message seems to be the same.

In many subtle ways the message is often not the same. Most particularly there are changes between the King James and other translations regarding the person and characteristics of who exactly Jesus is. There's a good book by Gail Riplinger, called If the Foundations be Destroyed, on the topic.

Also of note, the reading level in the KJV Bible increases from Genesis through to Revelation, and it usually defines itself. The "archaic" language is not hard to understand in context and often carries more specific meaning than the dumbed down modern versions.

[–] [deleted] • 5 pts

This is well known. It has everything to do with the size of the human head. We have large brains.

[–] • 4 pts

Niggers pump out kids like it's their day job -- HA HA nigger with a job, I slay me -- so that means they're no better than animals.

You can't really compare homo sapiens with "the rest of the mammals". You needs to stick to close relatives, ie. the primates to be able to draw any meaningful conclusions. What is the typical gestation and birthing process of chimps or, even better, bonobos? This is the sort of question to be asking here.

[–] • 3 pts

It is traumatic for other animals. Just in different ways, and animals have way less pain receptors.

[–] • 2 pts

The jew doctors rip the kids away, throw them in a scale to weight them, then run them off to give all the vax/shots. If its a boy, get the ole penis hacked up. Then, baby sits with mom. At least a fuckin moose baby gets to see its mom right away. She cleans it and helps it stand up. Hopefully the wolves aint too hungry...

[–] • 2 pts

It seems You are referring to the the 'MSM/liberal' lie/agenda that Everything is traumatic.

[–] • 2 pts

It's not. And they are similar. The issue is (((medicine))). Get a midwife and birth out of hospital and there's no "trauma".

[–] • 2 pts

That's a great question. Why do homo sapiens have so many reproductive problems? Well there's a hypothesis that explains it it actually explains a lot, but it's a bit of a rabbit hole and it might change your entire perception of humanity:

The Hybrid Hypothesis(http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html)

[–] • 1 pt

Because you touch yourself at night.

[–] • 1 pt

There are two reasons, we have proportionately larger heads than other animals and the female pelvis can't be any larger than it is without compromising the ability to run, which is pretty important for survival.

The other reason is that hospitals make it worse to make more money.