WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

986

Archived: https://archive.ph/fXvpv

https://pic8.co/sh/n6Q00J.jpeg

The numbers are much worse than the headline. The mean is 5 months of reduced sperm count which means many men could be having 12+ months of reduced sperm count. Then if they get an annual shot, there's no chance of recovery.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209

Archived: https://archive.ph/fXvpv https://pic8.co/sh/n6Q00J.jpeg > The numbers are much worse than the headline. The mean is 5 months of reduced sperm count which means many men could be having 12+ months of reduced sperm count. Then if they get an annual shot, there's no chance of recovery. > https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209

(post is archived)

[–] 8 pts

Too bad studies, facts, evidence and proof don't stand a chance against the narrative.

[–] 0 pt

Just hold out until the narrative boosters itself to death.