Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

620

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts

All you other anons here missed the big part.

In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

They just admitted the old test couldn't tell the difference between covid and flu.

[–] • 4 pts

That's old news. Just nobody seems to care. Lol... Fucking absolute 🤡 world.

[–] • 2 pts

they knew it never did... you just finally caught on to the phony casedemic, so they phase it out and scene change. We are onto the unvaxxinatedemic now, no go-backsies. Now you need to get the jab that you don't need that won't help you stop what doesn't exist, that they'll admit after they've made you/starved you to death unnecessarily.

[–] • 2 pts

Can I opt for a quick death over a blood clot overdose?

[–] • 2 pts

>a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.

https://www.pasteur.fr/en/home/press-area/press-documents/operation-and-reliability-rt-pcr-tests-detection-sars-cov-2

PRESS INFO 2020.11.16

>Reliability of the RT-PCR test To guarantee the performance of the test under development, scientists employed a system able to detect whether the three sequences used to recognize SARS-CoV-2 were present in other living organisms. With regard to the RT-PCR tests developed by the National Reference Center, the three sequences are not present simultaneously in any other organisms apart from SARS-CoV-2. The test is then validated on primary samples (confirmed as positive and negative) to verify its specificity and sensitivity (no false positives or false negatives). Negative controls (here for example nose or throat samples taken before 2019) can help assess the risk of non-specific amplification. Finally, it is advisable to use two different tests (the two tests developed by the CNR at the Institut Pasteur are named IP2 and IP4) on the same sample to guarantee the reliability of the result. This means that six sequences of the viral genome, rather than three, need to be recognized and amplified, thereby increasing the reliability of RT-PCR testing.

[–] • 0 pt

Give some context you retard, those paragraphs contradict themself

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

You got nigger badged

For a reason

You've failed at pattern recognition

[–] • 3 pts

Basically they have engineered new tests and the PCR test is 'outdated' because they have rapid result test that give them the results they want with no PCR cycle questions.

[–] • 3 pts

The rapid antibody tests were ready early 2020, but the FDA refused to approve them until recently. It seems they first wanted the lab tests to collect DNA from everybody, the antibody tests can be done at home. Now, there is almost nobody left who was never tested and they can stop the DNA sampling.

[–] • 3 pts

I haven't taken one single test. Don't plan on it either.

[–] • 3 pts

Never had a test. Never will.

[–] • 2 pts

I am sure they will be replaced with contaminated tests to coincide with the "get tested multiple times per week forever" policies they have implemented.

[–] • 1 pt

casedemic has now become a unvaxxedemic

[–] • 1 pt

Statement incoming, "Because the pcr test was invalidated, and because there is no valid testing option available, the only way to protect people from covid is the vaccination. Moving forward, a weekly negative covid test will not be accepted for continuing employment."

We are led by the most basic, childlike, criminals.

[–] • 1 pt

You are COVID positive unless you are vaccinated.

[–] • 1 pt

"CDC says that since they didn’t have a sample, they used “contrived samples”."

No purified isolated Sars-Cov-2 sample exists on earth.