IT IS APPROVED FOR ANTIPARASITIC USES. Where the negatives are outweighed by the positives. Come the fuck on 0k. You're smarter than this jewish propaganda.
It seems that you interpret this headline as a threat to your narrative/opinion, as an attack on ivermectin, as pro vax propaganda I don't. To me it underlines one of the many FDA's rhetorical inconsistencies, first and foremost.
as a threat to your narrative/opinion, you interpret it as an attack on ivermectin,
How?
So you straight up say my narrative/opinion is pro-ivermectin when I am anti-ivermectin and label it properly as a jew psyop. I 100% do not see this as an attack on ivermectin. This is a piece of pro-ivermectin propaganda. That's it. You're very clear on that with the lie of ommission in the title.
The FDA says ivermectin “can be dangerous and even lethal,” yet they approved it in 1998 and have not pulled it from the market...
Those two statements DO NOT disagree with each other. Ivermectin IS SAFE. For PARASITES, namely various worm types mainly.
Ivermectin IS NOT SAFE for a virus THAT DOES NOT EXIST. You are lying full on dude.
Also. EVEN IF covid IS real. Ivemectin DOES NOT fight it in addition to the fact that the potential side effects of ivermectin FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR outweigh the sub .0001% mortality rate of the HIGH END of covid.
>Ivermectin IS NOT SAFE for a virus
Can you at least begin to describe how ivermectin works? Sounds pretty effective at allowing zinc to enter the cells, where it then interferes with viral replication
>a virus THAT DOES NOT EXIST.
Sars-cov-2 doesn't exist? You don't want to go there. That's like saying viruses don't exist, that's like going full flat earth essentially. At best you'll end up with a "it's just the flu" stance, which in turn will lead to negating the genetic differences between coronaviruses, which in turn won't remain consistent with your stance on genetic differences between humans. "We are all the same!"...
Again, you want to go there, be my guest, but it won't end well. You'll have to demonstrate that the sequencing of sars-cov-2/n-cov is a forgery, first, and we both know you aren't going to succeed.
(post is archived)