>Ivermectin IS NOT SAFE for a virus
Can you at least begin to describe how ivermectin works? Sounds pretty effective at allowing zinc to enter the cells, where it then interferes with viral replication
>a virus THAT DOES NOT EXIST.
Sars-cov-2 doesn't exist? You don't want to go there. That's like saying viruses don't exist, that's like going full flat earth essentially. At best you'll end up with a "it's just the flu" stance, which in turn will lead to negating the genetic differences between coronaviruses, which in turn won't remain consistent with your stance on genetic differences between humans. "We are all the same!"...
Again, you want to go there, be my guest, but it won't end well. You'll have to demonstrate that the sequencing of sars-cov-2/n-cov is a forgery, first, and we both know you aren't going to succeed.
Sars-cov-2 doesn't exist? You don't want to go there. That's like saying viruses don't exist,
Fallacy of composition. No. I'm not dignifying anything further.
Oh, I see... You wrongly label my rebuttal as "fallacy of composition", and that's the reason why you're throwing the towel... Nobody with half of a brain is going to buy that.
In my book, that's just called a bullshit excuse
Edit: and the butthurt made you push that downvote button lol
Yes because you're spamming, lying, trying to deflect the lie onto me somehow. That is 100% a fallacy of composition;
the error of assuming that what is true of a member of a group is true for the group as a whole.
You're doing that with;
Sars-cov-2 doesn't exist? You don't want to go there. That's like saying viruses don't exist,
So fuck off with the spam, the lies, the jewish propaganda, and the false assertions. You're wrong at every turn.
(post is archived)