It "can be dangerous and even lethal" for their political agenda.
This. I found the winning answer.
Since ivermectin is now just a “horse dewormer” why is the CDC recommending refugees take it before arriving in the United States?
Genocidal CDC...
Qpost #523452341245. Probably because they have worms from fucking goats. There is no reason to take anything if you are healthy, Covid is fake. That makes you really want some huh
“Ivermectin has also been demonstrated to be a potent broad-spectrum specific inhibitor of importin α/β-mediated nuclear transport and demonstrates antiviral activity against several RNA viruses by blocking the nuclear trafficking of viral proteins”.
It fucking explains why you stupid fucking kike.
All African refugees who did not originate from or reside in countries where Loa loa infection is endemic (Box 1) should receive presumptive therapy with:
Illiterate fucking kike. You are so fucking stupid dude. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loa_loa
Well they are promiscuous with farm animals.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020326633 What dosage is it lethal? "The majority of safety and pharmacokinetic data on oral administrated ivermectin are from doses of 0.15–0.20 mg/kg. This study provided histologic and hematologic information for higher doses using Corydoras fish as animal model. High doses of 0.22 and 0.86 mg/kg were not harmful to the intestinal tissues of the animal model neither affected the blood cells counting in general. The overdose of 170 mg/kg was demonstrated to affect Myosin-Vb, which can have implications in the intestinal epidermal integrity. "
check my math - 150 lbs = 68 kg, meaning don't take more than 170 mg x 68 = 11,560 mg
Don't eat 11.56 grams of ivermectin apple flavored horse paste (sold in 6 gram tubes) in one sitting.
Water is lethal if taken in large doses
I don't really care about any of this shit because I'm not worried about COVID. This new thing against Ivermectin is definitely bizarre at the least though. It's not like it is some radical, experimental drug that just got cooked up in a lab somewhere. Cough.
IT IS APPROVED FOR ANTIPARASITIC USES. Where the negatives are outweighed by the positives. Come the fuck on 0k. You're smarter than this jewish propaganda.
It seems that you interpret this headline as a threat to your narrative/opinion, as an attack on ivermectin, as pro vax propaganda I don't. To me it underlines one of the many FDA's rhetorical inconsistencies, first and foremost.
as a threat to your narrative/opinion, you interpret it as an attack on ivermectin,
How?
So you straight up say my narrative/opinion is pro-ivermectin when I am anti-ivermectin and label it properly as a jew psyop. I 100% do not see this as an attack on ivermectin. This is a piece of pro-ivermectin propaganda. That's it. You're very clear on that with the lie of ommission in the title.
The FDA says ivermectin “can be dangerous and even lethal,” yet they approved it in 1998 and have not pulled it from the market...
Those two statements DO NOT disagree with each other. Ivermectin IS SAFE. For PARASITES, namely various worm types mainly.
Ivermectin IS NOT SAFE for a virus THAT DOES NOT EXIST. You are lying full on dude.
Also. EVEN IF covid IS real. Ivemectin DOES NOT fight it in addition to the fact that the potential side effects of ivermectin FAR FAR FAR FAR FAR outweigh the sub .0001% mortality rate of the HIGH END of covid.
>Ivermectin IS NOT SAFE for a virus
Can you at least begin to describe how ivermectin works? Sounds pretty effective at allowing zinc to enter the cells, where it then interferes with viral replication
>a virus THAT DOES NOT EXIST.
Sars-cov-2 doesn't exist? You don't want to go there. That's like saying viruses don't exist, that's like going full flat earth essentially. At best you'll end up with a "it's just the flu" stance, which in turn will lead to negating the genetic differences between coronaviruses, which in turn won't remain consistent with your stance on genetic differences between humans. "We are all the same!"...
Again, you want to go there, be my guest, but it won't end well. You'll have to demonstrate that the sequencing of sars-cov-2/n-cov is a forgery, first, and we both know you aren't going to succeed.
(post is archived)