WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

So I'm still trying to figure out what the big endgame with the "vaccine" is. Could it be to control population? Maybe. Fertility? Maybe. However I've seen a few things suggesting that anyone who takes the vaccine who is either sick with covid or has been exposed to covid, having a negative reaction to the jab. Looks like it's because it causes your own body to attack itself (makes you destroy your own natural defenses) Also Red Cross says you can't donate plasma if you've had the jab because vaccinated people still have the jab that destroys the body's own antibodies?

Just a thought: they want us dependent on vaccines like computers depend on virus updates. Big pharma doesn't make money on healthy people, we've always known that. If you can't even fight off a flu bug because now your body is dependent on a vaccine? They just keep releasing a "new strain" every year or so and people need to get the jab just to live or even function in society because you will be "incentivized" to get it. Not like the flu shot where it's optional, this will be mandatory.

I'm just theoretically throwing something out there. I'm just trying to figure out what the endgame is. This isn't a "vaccine" like traditional ones, and there is a MAJOR push from governments to media and tech to not even criticize the damn thing. Anyone got any other ideas?

It's money all the way. People try to think of it with too much complexity. I think your theory is spot on. The owners don't have the incentive to wipe out the compliant slaves.