Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Got another website I'm being blocked because I don't want to be advertised to

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Weird, I am not blocked even when using VPN+ Brave Shields strict with Umatrix (everything blocked but 1st party), Decentraleyes and a pop-up blocker and a script blocker. Yeah I'm not joking with browser safety. I'm curious, what do you use?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Brave

[–] • 0 pt

Try using umatrix. It's great to see and block (((google))) (((facebook))) and other (((3rd party websites)))

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

And yet again the fucking article doesn’t mention the fucking sample size. I’m not getting the vaccine, I think it’s dangerous and experimental and I’m not taking the risk.

But it’s awful goddamn suspicious when we mention “6000 deaths” without giving a sample size. Guess what? Thousands upon thousands of people do die every single day. If the number of deaths of vaccinated people isn’t higher than the rate of deaths among those who did not get the vaccine, or the general population, if there’s nothing statistically significant about this number of deaths, then it’s worthless and meaningless information that is too easy for people to roll her eyes out and forget.

And how are we determining if the vaccines are responsible for these deaths and injuries? That’s like the same bullshit the Covid assholes pull.

“Look at all of these dead people who had Covid!” But they never show any evidence that it was actually Covid that killed them, or if they coincidentally died while being Covid positive.

I mean, keep doing that if you want, but then stop bitching when no one believes you.

In fact it’s getting to the point that it looks deliberate because every single time one of you guys links to an article the article does not mention the overall sample size! What part of that do we not understand?! It makes it look like it’s deliberately misleading! Holy shit.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Nice try Vaxx shill. This (((data))) is not to be trusted because most doctors (in my opinion, 99%) do not report vaccines adverse events. For VAERS, the estimation is that only 1% of the adverse events are reported but it's (((Harvard))) saying this so... lol.

For those who are not big pharma shills: watch Vaxxed I, Vaxxed II, Trace Amounts, etc. then decide if this (((experimental gene altering drug))) is safe.

You think I'm crazy? Remember when the (((Science))) said tobacco or Thalidomide were fine? I remember. Do you remember H1N1 and H5N1? Same shit but it failed for some reasons.

Want to see an adverse event? https://poal.co/s/memes/349109 or look up Bell's Palsy (it can be permanent). Want to know more about adverse events? Read VAERS excel sheet: it's fucking juicy and horrible.