So, I read the report provided by the UK government, which this website links to and references... It says absolutely nothing about this conflated headline, and actually goes to disprove the headline.
Not sure why they'd include a link to a peer-reviewed study that contradicts their own headline...
So, I read the report provided by the UK government, which this website links to and references... It says absolutely nothing about this conflated headline, and actually goes to disprove the headline.
Not sure why they'd include a link to a peer-reviewed study that contradicts their own headline...
Red flag was the article's heavily biased language and general immaturity in the writing. I didn't have time to read or look at the source yet but I checked back on this post just to see if someone else had.
Red flag was the article's heavily biased language and general immaturity in the writing. I didn't have time to read or look at the source yet but I checked back on this post just to see if someone else had.
It links to another article, of the same caliber, making the same statements... except that article links to a study that stated nothing in terms of miscarriages or deaths of that sort.
It links to another article, of the same caliber, making the same statements... except that article links to a study that stated nothing in terms of miscarriages or deaths of that sort.
Why does this happen?
Why does this happen?
(post is archived)