Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

757

RNA is a different molecule from DNA, not just in being single-stranded, but it uses different components in its construction; this is a natural part of the mechanism that keeps your DNA from being spuriously modified.

Edit: I never said the vaccine was not harmful. I said, it does not modify your DNA, and that claiming so is being used to discredit the argument. Fucking nitwits.

RNA is a different molecule from DNA, not just in being single-stranded, but it uses different components in its construction; this is a natural part of the mechanism that keeps your DNA from being spuriously modified. Edit: I never said the vaccine was not harmful. I said, it does not modify your DNA, and that claiming so is being used to discredit the argument. Fucking nitwits.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Was Zuckerberg just playing 4d chess when he said it changes DNA in his leaked meeting recording?

(I am with you... it seems like a crazy pill that they are using to humiliate dissenters)

[–] • 1 pt

Looks like 5D chess: He also said it can change RNA, knowing that this is even more crazy. And he got half of the conspiracy community to accept him as a medical expert (if Zuck says it, it must be true because he has insider knowledge).

[–] • 2 pts

I just dismiss all laboratory injections as dubious. Why would I entrust my blood to the people who want to drink it?

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

RNA can be incorporated into DNA spontaneously though. We know this because bits of viral RNA end up trapped in our DNA. Scientists have studied this. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176331/

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6407/1069.summary

Introducing any foreign RNA into your system has a non zero chance of being incorporated into your DNA. Specifically this vaccine RNA is designed with preservatives to keep it around in your system longer than it naturally would be so therefore the chance that it gets incorporated into your DNA during cell replication is potentially even higher.

[–] • 1 pt

It's not impossible, if a retrovirus is working in your system it might write that into your DNA. But if that's happening you've got a lot more problems than just this vaccine.

[–] • 0 pt

The nucleus, where the DNA resides, is the fortified part of the cell - it is extremely difficult to bring stuff into it. There are viruses that do exactly that: Their RNA or DNA contains the blueprints to create proteins that not only enter the nucleus, these proteins also cut and replace parts of the DNA. But the mRNA vaccines are way too short to do such things, and they never enter the nucleus.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176331/ https://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6407/1069.summary

This is about the RNA that is produced in the nucleus and not brought out correctly ("failure to remove ribonucleotides from DNA").

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

The RNA in the vaccine enters the nucleus of your cells and reconfigures them to produce viral antibodies that bind to the Ace2 receptors and block covid-19 from infecting cells. Thats how it acts as a prophylactic and trains the bodies immune system to recognize covid-19 from all of their own literature. So this RNA "vaccine" is entering the nucleus of your cells. Assuming they aren't just lying about whats actually in the vaccine. They could be using CRISPR to do other fun stuff because crisper itself is also just RNA.

[–] • 0 pt

No. Sorry, I don't want to be disrespectful, but this is not exact what happens.

RNA is produced in the nucleus, leaves the nucleus and is then used by protein factories as blueprints. Viruses use the same factories, their RNA let the factories produce proteins that are alien to the cell. When a cell detects that alien/viral material, it moves it to its surface and presents it to the cells of the immune system. The immune system learns to fight against the viral material by producing antibodies. Also, the immune system sends killer cells to destroy and eat the virus presenting cell as soon as possible (hopefully before viruses escape).

Vaccination mRNA does the same as virus RNA, but it is only the blueprint of a small part of the real virus (just the spike protein), so the immune system learns to create antibodies against the spike protein.

The nucleus is not involved in mRNA vaccines. It is involved in the AstraZeneca vaccine: They use a "living" virus that creates proteins that enter the nucleus and then create RNA there. This RNA then leaves the nucleus like RNA created by the cell. It also contains the blueprint of the spike protein.

But even the AZ vaccine does no "reconfiguration", the original mechanisms of the cell work unchanged. They just temporary trick a protein factory into using a blueprint that is not produced by the cell.

[–] • 1 pt

Look up mRNA vaccine trials from a decade ago. They tried these vaccines in rats. The trials were halted after liver and other organ damage occurred, only discovered after autopsy was done. It took many months for organ damage to become evident.

[–] • 0 pt

As I said elsewhere, I never said it wasn't harmful.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not arguing with you, just trying to help add to the conversation. For me, the lack of information on long-term effects of the vaccine coupled with the 99+% survival rate of the disease it targets makes this vaccine an immediate no-go for me.

[–] • 1 pt

DNA in layman's terms is just shorthand for "genetic integrity" so the fucking molecular particulars are not especially relevant.

[–] • 1 pt

I never said it wasn't harmful. But no, it does not damage your "genetic integrity". (At least, not unless there's something in there other than mRNA.)

[–] • -1 pt

No institutions or individuals in the world of men can be trusted in these circumstances so i just outright refuse to hear an ad for it.