The 'm' in mRNA stands for 'modified'. The injection is a genetically modified organism.
Genetically modified organisms are/ have been PATENTABLE.
If the vaccine modifies your DNA (reports indicate this is true), then are you now a patentable product?
This is a very relevant question. The nay-sayers will attack anyone who asks this question. However legal contracts, implied or not, override your Rights. Consenting to the vaccine is an implied contract. Sending your children to a public school forfeits your Right as the parent (guardian). If you look at the contract you signed when entering your children to a public school, it makes the school the guardian (parent) of your child(ren) for the time they are there.
The deceit is deep and wide. The sanctity of your body and your children depend on property rights. Possession is ALWAYS nine-tenths of the law.
The m in mRNA stands for messenger not modified.
Technically, you are correct. Notwithstanding, when we referring to this vaccine, it is indeed modified. I have seen it referred to sometimes as modRNA, but all-too often it is written as simply mRNA. In this circle of science, mRNA is understood to be modified though. A nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) is a synthetic messenger RNA (mRNA) in which some nucleosides are replaced by other naturally modified nucleosides or by synthetic nucleoside analogues.
Thank you for pointing this out to avoid confusion.
When do you think they get to collect on that?
>"When do you think they get to collect on that?"
That word "collect" makes the word "collective" come to mind. When enough people are collectively vaccinated it would seem plausible to start making such claims. As a comparison, the Marxist inspired graduated income tax gave ownership to the hard working earnings of the population. The harder you worked to earn more, the more income tax you paid. The carbon tax is a tax over anything carbon based. Humans are carbon based. Your productivity determines whether your 'carbon footprint' is acceptable or not. Little or no productive individuals run the risk of having their carbon footprint deemed destructive to the whole. This makes the carbon tax even more insidiously controlling because it is a tax on your 'privilege' to exist.
Relate this scenario I just provided to the modified RNA vaccine, in which some nucleosides are replaced by other naturally modified nucleosides or by synthetic nucleoside analogues. Anyone who takes this vaccine becomes a genetically modified being. Would this vaccine provide the impetus for no longer being a sovereign human being if the carbon tax is imposed? It is something to think about, no?
The M stands for messenger.
Technically, you are correct. Notwithstanding, when we referring to this vaccine, it is indeed modified. I have seen it referred to sometimes as modRNA, but all-too often it is written as simply mRNA. In this circle of science, mRNA is understood to be modified though. A nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) is a synthetic messenger RNA (mRNA) in which some nucleosides are replaced by other naturally modified nucleosides or by synthetic nucleoside analogues.
Thank you for pointing this out to avoid confusion.
Dude don't spread nonsense... mRNA is -messenger- RNA ...
Read my response. Technically, you are correct. Notwithstanding, when we referring to this vaccine, it is indeed modified. I have seen it referred to sometimes as modRNA, but all-too often it is written as simply mRNA. In this circle of science, mRNA is understood to be modified though. A nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) is a synthetic messenger RNA (mRNA) in which some nucleosides are replaced by other naturally modified nucleosides or by synthetic nucleoside analogues.
(post is archived)