WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

309

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

I used an archive of this article because The Washington Post is so brazen in it's attempt to mislead.

They expect to present their readers with the evidence that the Impossible Burger is not healthy and yet still have them swallow this conclusion that there is no evidence.

Either that, or they expect their readers to read only the title. Beware the tricks.

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

.

[–] 1 pt

Now if the company would have called it "Breast Making Burger" then jews would be saying that the title proves it makes men grow breasts.

Fucking jews and those that pander to them

[–] 0 pt

Let's apply the arguments against vaping to this!

wE doN'T KnoW WHat's iN THEm!
Words like "Impossible" are clearly pandering to today's youth. Burger King is irresponsibly creating a whole new generation of meat eaters with this creation. Beef flavoring must be banned to save the children.
Burger King should only be allowed to sell these burger substitutes that have flavors that kid's won't find appealing.
Surely they can make the burger substitute taste like raw snails. It's for the good of the children!!!

We're going to need a scary sounding name for the action of eating a plant-based burger..... Cellucation? We'll come back to that idea.