WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

738

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

If you can't see this for what it is (a controlled opposition schtick) then I don't know what to tell you.

This is the same shit they pulled with the occupy wallstreet movement (OWS).

OWS started out on target (sort of). They understood that international banks were the problem.

Then over-the-top "leaders" appeared in the movement and started to round up OWS protestors into organized groups.

In that case, they were domesticated and herded into the "Tea Party" which started out with the same values, but then swerved towards a conservative platform and was later corralled into the Republican party, and the OWS movement was gate kept successfully.

In this case, this character actor is pulling Sasha Baron Cohenesque over-the-top stunts that will NOT resonate with the general public. This type of behavior will cause potentially sympathetic people to cringe. They see a loudmouth clown dressed up like a city slicker saying offensive things to police, behaving like a bully, while the police are calm and collected, simply trying to write a ticket. How does this scene (and I call it a scene because it appears staged) make people learn more about jewish supremacy and want to push back against it?

This character actor clown is running out in front of the parade. Yes, he's disseminating information that's potentially damning to jews on fliers, but because of his associated behavior, he's poisoning the well around this information.

Anyone who tries to do similar organizing is going to look like they are mimicking this character. Gypsy Crusader was doing this type of thing first, but he was targeted by law enforcement, did a stint in jail, and was just thrown back in jail for selling merch the jews don't approve of online just last month. (not kidding, look it up)

Notice almost exactly when Gypsy Crusader was arrested for a gun charge in 2018, this HT character crawled out of the woodwork? That's not a coincidence, it's a cohencidence.

GC is crucified by the courts and was just thrown back in jail for selling merch online that the jews didn't like, yet this HT character is allowed to do pull these stunts without any real resistance from law enforcement?

There's a reason for that. He's a character actor playing a role that is turning potentially sympathetic people away from the reality that they are ruled over by jewish supremacists. His persona doesn't appeal to the demographic that's potentially sympathetic. It's not unifying. It's highly divisive.

If you need proof of this HT character being divisive, look at the groups forming on poal both in support and not supporting this clown.

Then I look at real, legitimate leaders like David Duke, or legitimate activists like GC, and I don't see the same division happening.

That's all I need to know.

[–] 5 pts

There is a potential that every single openly and publicly Nationalist "influencer" is a controlled opposition. I myself have been accused of being a glowie for posting pro NatSoc stuff.

HT's materials have helped me immeasurably to redpill my inner circle and to learn new stuff myself. Videos where he acts like this toward kikes is a huge morale boost to people I send them to, and to me personally.

The truth is we don't need to redpill 60 year old grandma's who cry every time they watch Schmeiser's list, we need to redpill young and angry people who are aware something is off, but don't know what exactly and who's doing it.

We need materials that will turn their depression into anger, fuel and direct their rage.

I take into account your warning that HT might be controlled opposition and will keep taking everything he does more than a grain of salt, but will also take into account that he might not be controlled, has a good legal support and knows how to balance on the edge of the law, and has his own unique approach to the situation.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

You need ~20% to be in support and a few percentage active to affect change and start a movement.

Right now 0.1% of the population is awake and outspoken, but the vast majority of potential supporters are backing magatard "fake anti-RINO" clowns.

These are the people that need to be woken up and won over. Controlled opposition or not, I don't think HT is the character for the job. Yeah, he appeals to the 0.1% that's already outspoken, but that's not what is needed now.

What is needed now is a charismatic, respectable, passionate leader who is a great public speaker and has mass appeal. Someone who sticks to the facts, is a serious person, and isn't putting a professional wrestling act handing out fliers about jews sucking baby penis and helping to get anti-free speech laws passed (which is exactly what the jews want, so they can put the 0.1% in prison).

The audience we need currently "backs the blue". This stunt is literal poison in terms of gaining their support. Those cops looked like saints just trying to do their job. The "shaking" cop taps into White empathy and makes Whites sympathetic to the cops. HT looks like a city slicker bully. How many successful political leaders adopt the persona of a city slicker who bullies cops and makes them shake in their boots?

We need a Hitler - a caring, charismatic, populist/nationalist leader with broad appeal who fights against the international jew bankers and their agendas while giving people hope for a better future. We do not need a vile, divisive, Sasha Baron Cohen skit, and this HT character is sucking all of the air out of the room.

[–] 0 pt

I believed there is a lot more anger in the world now than there was at the time Hitler started to come in.

We have been living in almost a century of jewish victory over us, and they are getting braver and stomping down on us harder and harder year by year.

What will the new uprising look like this time? Who knows, but it definitely won't be lead by guys like HT or GypsyCrusader, as they are just an early stage anger propaganda machine for our side.

One thing is certain, it will be near impossible to creat a Hitler like movement out in the open like it was done before.

[–] 1 pt

I used to ride around in the car with my dad when I was a kid listening to David duke on the radio. And David duke is still doing his thing with his podcast and it’s really good.

But to think David Duke was on the fucking radio back then is incredible. The “Conservative Hotline” was the show. He was good on the radio and used mostly facts. He isn’t and wasn’t some lunatic on the radio. I found some old episodes. They were good but lacked passion you’d hope to hear behind the mic. But he’s a chill guy so it was natural. I’ve shared his podcast link before. It’s a good show.

I read that one of Duke’s critics (of his show) was a kike “conservative” who owned one of the stations that carried Duke’s show. He basically called the show lame and wanted Duke to act up for ratings. Something fishy about that. And the kike’s surname was “Namer.” Ironic.

Anyway. I like HT. He’s entertaining. He’s got great info that has some power in the form of those flyers. I don’t agree that he’s C.O. but I’ll agree that behavior like this is cringe. You’re right, he could carry himself calmly in this situation and still get it all out there. Maybe he will evolve but I also don’t know how he feels and what’s in his heart at that moment.

I hear the skepticism of HT and while it may be valid I'm not yet convinced. At the very least he's entertaining. Even worst case scenario, drawing attention to forbidden talking points is a positive. At this rate the first amendment's days are numbered. Use it or lose it. If you accept that we can't talk about certain things in a certain way I'm afraid you're admitting we already lost the battle. It's a self fulfilling prophesy at that point.