![Never forget that they only want equality if they’re losing. [720x674 - 70KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/1xEkCe.jpg){kind=link}
>Ummm... like... you know, equality. Like, you know, until the thing. You know, until women like earn as much as men in those like jobs that you know are like really male.
You won't get anything close to what you're asking for, from normies. It would be like asking a Qtard what results Q must deliver by next month to still get them to "trust the plan" with every fiber of their being.
That's the point.
If you force them to define it, then you force them to acknowledge that they are unable to do so. At that point you can attack them for their beliefs as being illegitimate, and further that they have been manipulated to promote a lie.
You overestimate normies. Normies can't even acknowledge Jewish male genital mutilation for what it is although they can define it. Yet, if you bring up the pen-prick female """circumcision""" they will be dialing 911 before you finish the sentence. You are not getting though the programming with the Socratic method. If it were that easy then Whites would have won at Little Rock.
You overestimate normies.
You overestimate what matters: it's not the individual norm that you're trying to convince, it's the crowd (it's the audience). The norm just follows the crowd and won't ever be convinced unless the crowd is convinced. The crowd is swayed by those individuals within it that can be convinced -- that can bridge the gap to that crowd, or to brain-drain out individuals from the crowd.
The individual norm is to be used as a target to apply a message for the crowd to be exposed to.
(post is archived)