Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

435

I say this just because I want to start a discussion. I kind of want to hear from them what they think is wrong with the physics because that seems to be a main point for them. What brought Japan to its knees and destroyed two cities? What were those 2,121 tests that were done? What kind of events were they really? What about 49,000 cancer deaths directly attributed to domestic testing? Why is there a market for iron from sunken war ships to build medical equipment and scientific instruments? Why would people bother?

Mostly I care about the physics and the other questions are for people to answer if they feel they can't weigh in on that part. You don't have to know everything, but just tell us what you do know. Let's talk about it.

Anyways for the sake of the sub /u/BushChuck is a guy I disagree with. (yes I know that's actually a username).

I say this just because I want to start a discussion. I kind of want to hear from them what they think is wrong with the physics because that seems to be a main point for them. What brought Japan to its knees and destroyed two cities? What were those 2,121 tests that were done? What kind of events were they really? What about 49,000 cancer deaths directly attributed to domestic testing? Why is there a market for iron from sunken war ships to build medical equipment and scientific instruments? Why would people bother? Mostly I care about the physics and the other questions are for people to answer if they feel they can't weigh in on that part. You don't have to know everything, but just tell us what you do know. Let's talk about it. Anyways for the sake of the sub /u/BushChuck is a guy I disagree with. (yes I know that's actually a username).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (46).
[–] • 1 pt

Too many holes in the moon landings. That should be pretty obvious it was faked. You had nasa engineers saying it wasn't possible with the craft they had, but sure enough, "we went to the moon" Nasa seems to be a very expensive science project that produces nothing of any use here. A few billion dollars for some video feeds and pictures.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Well, it provides fringe benefits here and there, but so would spending billions of dollars on anything.

In fact if they hadn't spent the money the market would have used the resources somewhere and so those billions would have been expended on something and the associated fringe developments would have come with it. They would just be different and likely even more relevant to actual commercial processes.