Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

197

I say this just because I want to start a discussion. I kind of want to hear from them what they think is wrong with the physics because that seems to be a main point for them. What brought Japan to its knees and destroyed two cities? What were those 2,121 tests that were done? What kind of events were they really? What about 49,000 cancer deaths directly attributed to domestic testing? Why is there a market for iron from sunken war ships to build medical equipment and scientific instruments? Why would people bother?

Mostly I care about the physics and the other questions are for people to answer if they feel they can't weigh in on that part. You don't have to know everything, but just tell us what you do know. Let's talk about it.

Anyways for the sake of the sub /u/BushChuck is a guy I disagree with. (yes I know that's actually a username).

I say this just because I want to start a discussion. I kind of want to hear from them what they think is wrong with the physics because that seems to be a main point for them. What brought Japan to its knees and destroyed two cities? What were those 2,121 tests that were done? What kind of events were they really? What about 49,000 cancer deaths directly attributed to domestic testing? Why is there a market for iron from sunken war ships to build medical equipment and scientific instruments? Why would people bother? Mostly I care about the physics and the other questions are for people to answer if they feel they can't weigh in on that part. You don't have to know everything, but just tell us what you do know. Let's talk about it. Anyways for the sake of the sub /u/BushChuck is a guy I disagree with. (yes I know that's actually a username).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (46).
[–] • 0 pt

I'd almost buy the not going to the moon thing. Like it would make sense to fake it. I would have. But it turns out we didn't and we actually did that. People use the idea of the moon landings being fake as an example of government being evil and lying to us about everything. I choose to not put limits on how evil I think the government can be so I have no problem with thinking that the government is irresponsible and evil enough to waste the money to actually go to the moon.

[–] • 1 pt

Too many holes in the moon landings. That should be pretty obvious it was faked. You had nasa engineers saying it wasn't possible with the craft they had, but sure enough, "we went to the moon" Nasa seems to be a very expensive science project that produces nothing of any use here. A few billion dollars for some video feeds and pictures.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Well, it provides fringe benefits here and there, but so would spending billions of dollars on anything.

In fact if they hadn't spent the money the market would have used the resources somewhere and so those billions would have been expended on something and the associated fringe developments would have come with it. They would just be different and likely even more relevant to actual commercial processes.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The images of the alleged landers foot pad are enough. Absolutely pristine, not a single speck of dust. Go look at the image. In the first alleged landing, listen to the astroNot's talking to NASA, they mention the dust cloud coming up as they are about to touch down.

Just the one image is and that audio is enough for any sane reasonable person to at least have very serious doubts, but there is so much other evidence of their lies.

They might, might have sent an unmanned bot to do the laser bounce thing. Or they might have just found something already there to bounce lasers off from earth.

[–] • 1 pt

Damn, I might be sold. I just watched PJ's "satirical" video about being a moon landing denier, but everything was legitimate complaints. The objects appearing in front of cross hairs supposedly etched into a lens are pretty damning.