There are people who seriously believe we live on a flat Earth ... others who believe we never went to the moon. Having spent my career as a Minuteman ICBM guy, you get no argument from me. But you're fighting an unwinnable battle ... so many 'know' they're right and always being lied to. Go figure.
Have worked with people like you (I think). Some serious fucking people for people acting out a grand charade.
But what about the radiation belt that means we couldn't have gone to the moon! AmIrite guys?
Even if it were partially true, this was the 60s. The US didn't care about human life if the nuke and space program were involved. Sometimes things that should kill people don't. Even though a lot of people died as a result of the nuclear tests a lot of people didn't who should have.
Plus they were traveling in a metal box. If they were smart they would have added mesh to the windows.
I was being sarcastic.
In the very near future we'll have reaction videos of flat earthers getting launched into space. Someone's bound to do it and make it a reality show or something. When that happens I expect them to shift to "we're living in a simulation". :)
The right reality show can get a pretty big budget. DDG isn't playing nice with "highest budget reality tv show" but I know Game of Thrones gets $7 million per episode. Friends got $10 million. How can we makes this as compelling as Friends?
I'd almost buy the not going to the moon thing. Like it would make sense to fake it. I would have. But it turns out we didn't and we actually did that. People use the idea of the moon landings being fake as an example of government being evil and lying to us about everything. I choose to not put limits on how evil I think the government can be so I have no problem with thinking that the government is irresponsible and evil enough to waste the money to actually go to the moon.
Too many holes in the moon landings. That should be pretty obvious it was faked. You had nasa engineers saying it wasn't possible with the craft they had, but sure enough, "we went to the moon" Nasa seems to be a very expensive science project that produces nothing of any use here. A few billion dollars for some video feeds and pictures.
Well, it provides fringe benefits here and there, but so would spending billions of dollars on anything.
In fact if they hadn't spent the money the market would have used the resources somewhere and so those billions would have been expended on something and the associated fringe developments would have come with it. They would just be different and likely even more relevant to actual commercial processes.
The images of the alleged landers foot pad are enough. Absolutely pristine, not a single speck of dust. Go look at the image. In the first alleged landing, listen to the astroNot's talking to NASA, they mention the dust cloud coming up as they are about to touch down.
Just the one image is and that audio is enough for any sane reasonable person to at least have very serious doubts, but there is so much other evidence of their lies.
They might, might have sent an unmanned bot to do the laser bounce thing. Or they might have just found something already there to bounce lasers off from earth.
Damn, I might be sold. I just watched PJ's "satirical" video about being a moon landing denier, but everything was legitimate complaints. The objects appearing in front of cross hairs supposedly etched into a lens are pretty damning.
SO sitting in a room with a couple dozen buttons and knobs qualifies you as an expert on the veracity of nuclear weapons?
Hey, dipshit. You end a sentence with a full stop. Like this.
Not like this...
LOL - no, watching the uneducated making fools of themselves makes me feel good. Enjoy.
Ah, you're some sort of genius that spent his career baby sitting a 1960's console, and uses language like "lol"?
That about the speed of it, Lt. Professor?
(post is archived)