KEK.
I learned that the political reward is in the announcement, not the outcome.
KEK.
I learned that the political reward is in the announcement, not the outcome.
- Not a threat. Criminals don't fucking care and nearly all of them are too fucking stupid to use a 3d-printer. Also, a really good 3d-printer costs more than a gun at the store. It costs a FUCK load more than a stolen/illegal gun.
- Fuck you Commies.
Archive: https://archive.today/sU4U4
From the post:
>Colorado lawmakers advanced a bill Friday that would ban the unlicensed manufacture of 3D-printed firearms and their components and restrict the distribution of digital instructions for printing them.
It's a measure born out of two Colorado shootings, but it is drawing pushback from Republicans on both First and Second Amendment grounds. House Bill 26-1144 advanced on a second reading in the House on Friday after being amended to narrow its scope. The original bill would have banned the possession of 3D-printed firearms and the digital instructions for making them. The amended version focuses on manufacturing and selling. The bill's origins trace in part to the March 2023 shooting at Denver's East High School, where 17-year-old Austin Lyle shot two school deans and later took his own life. After the shooting, investigators searched the home where Lyle lived and found a 3D printer and materials for it, along with what police believed was a failed attempt to make a 3D-printed gun. Police determined the gun Lyle used in the shooting was consistent with one made by a 3D printer. A 3D-printed gun was also found at the scene of the mass shooting at Club Q in Colorado Springs.
1. Not a threat. Criminals don't fucking care and nearly all of them are too fucking stupid to use a 3d-printer. Also, a really good 3d-printer costs more than a gun at the store. It costs a FUCK load more than a stolen/illegal gun.
2. Fuck you Commies.
Archive: https://archive.today/sU4U4
From the post:
>>Colorado lawmakers advanced a bill Friday that would ban the unlicensed manufacture of 3D-printed firearms and their components and restrict the distribution of digital instructions for printing them.
It's a measure born out of two Colorado shootings, but it is drawing pushback from Republicans on both First and Second Amendment grounds.
House Bill 26-1144 advanced on a second reading in the House on Friday after being amended to narrow its scope. The original bill would have banned the possession of 3D-printed firearms and the digital instructions for making them. The amended version focuses on manufacturing and selling.
The bill's origins trace in part to the March 2023 shooting at Denver's East High School, where 17-year-old Austin Lyle shot two school deans and later took his own life. After the shooting, investigators searched the home where Lyle lived and found a 3D printer and materials for it, along with what police believed was a failed attempt to make a 3D-printed gun. Police determined the gun Lyle used in the shooting was consistent with one made by a 3D printer. A 3D-printed gun was also found at the scene of the mass shooting at Club Q in Colorado Springs.