WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

908

Source. (amgreatness.com)

The National Rifle Association (NRA) has filed a lawsuit against the Biden Administration’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), as well as Attorney General Merrick Garland, over a new federal rule pertaining to firearms dealers.

As the Daily Caller reports, the ATF first imposed a new rule in April redefining what it means to be “engaged in the business” of selling firearms, so that the law would now include anyone who simply sells a smaller number of guns. The NRA filed its lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, seeking an injunction to block enforcement of the regulation.

The core of the NRA’s legal argument is that the ATF has overstepped its authority by circumventing Congress and implementing a new law that should have been decided by lawmakers first.

Building on the Garland v. Cargill decision, no doubt.

[Source.](https://amgreatness.com/2024/07/24/nra-files-lawsuit-against-biden-atf-over-new-gun-dealer-rule/) > The National Rifle Association (NRA) has filed a lawsuit against the Biden Administration’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), as well as Attorney General Merrick Garland, over a new federal rule pertaining to firearms dealers. > As the Daily Caller reports, the ATF first imposed a new rule in April redefining what it means to be “engaged in the business” of selling firearms, so that the law would now include anyone who simply sells a smaller number of guns. The NRA filed its lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, seeking an injunction to block enforcement of the regulation. > The core of the NRA’s legal argument is that the ATF has overstepped its authority by circumventing Congress and implementing a new law that should have been decided by lawmakers first. Building on the Garland v. Cargill decision, no doubt.

(post is archived)