On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the constitutional challenge to a federal law banning gun possession by a citizen who has a domestic violence restraining order. The vote on case United States vs. Rahimi was 8-1, only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. The decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts.
You can read the decision here.(supremecourt.gov)
The problem with this case and decision, says firearms civil rights activists, is that these restraining orders are subject to abuse and a major prejudice by judges to issue them with very low evidentiary standards.
The mainstream media and the gun-grabbing groups were busy celebrating another court decision in favor of restricting gun rights. As CNN reported, Joe Biden celebrated the anti-gun decision, saying through a prepared statement “As a result of today’s ruling, survivors of domestic violence and their families will still be able to count on critical protections, just as they have for the past three decades.”
.
.
Archive(archive.today)
>On Friday, the Supreme Court rejected the constitutional challenge to a federal law banning gun possession by a citizen who has a domestic violence restraining order. The vote on case United States vs. Rahimi was 8-1, only Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. The decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts.
>[You can read the decision here.](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf)
>The problem with this case and decision, says firearms civil rights activists, is that these restraining orders are subject to abuse and a major prejudice by judges to issue them with very low evidentiary standards.
>The mainstream media and the gun-grabbing groups were busy celebrating another court decision in favor of restricting gun rights. As CNN reported, Joe Biden celebrated the anti-gun decision, saying through a prepared statement “As a result of today’s ruling, survivors of domestic violence and their families will still be able to count on critical protections, just as they have for the past three decades.”
.
.
[Archive](https://archive.today/sNRAJ)
(post is archived)