"shall not be infringed" "to keep and bear arms" "arms" plural...
"shall not be infringed" "to keep and bear arms" "arms" plural...
[Archive](https://archive.today/2uOy2)
This is how the Overton window is moved. You introduce some form of limitation, then gradually introduce more limitations. We see this with free speech. Oh, we still have have free speech, you're only not allowed to be antisemitic. Oh, you still have free speech, but you're not allowed to spread misinformation and so on. Once you accept any limits, the limits increase.
This is how the Overton window is moved. You introduce some form of limitation, then gradually introduce more limitations. We see this with free speech. Oh, we still have have free speech, you're only not allowed to be antisemitic. Oh, you still have free speech, but you're not allowed to spread misinformation and so on. Once you accept any limits, the limits increase.
the scope of the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation
It's jewish from top-to-bottom. This ruling, while correct, is incorrect. What's happening here is a precedent is being set that (((gun regulation))) is historical tradition, which it's not.
e: the same thing was done with the nigger Thomas' opinion for Bruen V NY. The ruling was correct, the opinion was fully jewish. I posted oh poal about this. But the cat-lady fucks took away my points so I can't search comments for it.
>the scope of the nation’s historical tradition of gun regulation
It's jewish from top-to-bottom.
This ruling, while correct, is incorrect. What's happening here is a precedent is being set that (((gun regulation))) is historical tradition, which it's not.
e: the same thing was done with the nigger Thomas' opinion for Bruen V NY. The ruling was correct, the opinion was fully jewish. I posted oh poal about this. But the cat-lady @boone fucks took away my points so I can't search comments for it.
It should be one per month, minimum.
It should be one per month, minimum.
(post is archived)