WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

798

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 7 pts

Where we can and cannot carry firearms isn't up to any judge.

[–] 2 pts

What? I thought this was about carrying post offices. x.x

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Good. That ban was a gungrabber reaction to a string of postal workers killing their coworkers. Coining the expression "going postal." Some of you may be too young to remember this. Edit: I wonder if those killers had something in common besides being postal workers?

What does it mean when the post office flies their flag at half staff?

They're hiring.

[–] 2 pts

Maybe this judge is intelligent enough to Know that NO gun ban have EVER stopped a criminal from having a firearm.

[–] 2 pts

I would much rather carry a gun than a post office...

[–] 0 pt

You’re not thinking about it multidimensionally. The post office offers significant advantages.

[–] 0 pt

Lol, that typo was pretty bad

[–] 1 pt

Lol. Changes nothing for me.

[–] 0 pt

Every once in awhile they get something right.

[–] 0 pt

Is there a recommended shotgun shoulder holster for post office trips?