WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

226

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Not to mention AI. Great rebuttal!

Besides, I don't recall the 2nd amendment stating that only firearms with capabilities during that era were protected. jews are going to jew.

[–] 1 pt

While the Bruen judgement was correct, the opinion was pure judaism. I won't predict how this will go on appeal but I will say that it (the judge's reasoning) does fit within the language of Bruen - which is why the Bruen opinion is jewish and incorrect despite the judgement being correct.