“The features of modern assault weapons—particularly the AR-15’s radical increases in muzzle velocity, range, accuracy, and functionality—along with the types of injuries they can inflict are so different from colonial firearms that the two are not reasonably comparable,” the order said.
The features of modern communication mediums like the internet, telephones but particularly television's radical increases in ability to subvert, propagandize, ease of access and functionality - along with the types of media displayed are so different from colonial communication that the two are not reasonably comparable. Therefore talmudvision is not protected by the 1st!!!
These kikes are so obscenely low IQ that I will never not be shocked.
Not to mention AI. Great rebuttal!
Besides, I don't recall the 2nd amendment stating that only firearms with capabilities during that era were protected. jews are going to jew.
While the Bruen judgement was correct, the opinion was pure judaism. I won't predict how this will go on appeal but I will say that it (the judge's reasoning) does fit within the language of Bruen - which is why the Bruen opinion is jewish and incorrect despite the judgement being correct.
The founding fathers did not specify "weapons of this current time". They knew there would be changes and innovations and determined that that the rights to arm yourself would need to change with them.
Not one of them thought "Well, what if they make a pew pew that shoots really fast or holds a lot of bullets, we cant have them with that.. Just black powder muzzle loading guns".
(post is archived)