WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

870

It's his stance on gun control.

Despite all of the evil shit governments have done throughout history, including the US government, he refuses to acknowledge civilian gun ownership as a check and balance against tyranny.

He keeps talking about "saving the children from gun violence". I'll give him points for mentioning SSRI's on that one though.

He refuses to name the jew, which I understand, but he knows about jewish power as they killed his uncle.

He must also know what they are capable of doing to a disarmed population, e.g. Russia post 1917 revolution.

How could the know this history and still be pro-gun control?

This doesn't add up. He's controlled opposition or a naive retard. I don't want either running the country.

It's his stance on gun control. Despite all of the evil shit governments have done throughout history, including the US government, he refuses to acknowledge civilian gun ownership as a check and balance against tyranny. He keeps talking about "saving the children from gun violence". I'll give him points for mentioning SSRI's on that one though. He refuses to name the jew, which I understand, but he knows about jewish power as they killed his uncle. He must also know what they are capable of doing to a disarmed population, e.g. Russia post 1917 revolution. How could the know this history and still be pro-gun control? This doesn't add up. He's controlled opposition or a naive retard. I don't want either running the country.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

He also wanted "climate change deniers" sent to jail. That is a fundamentally authoritarian position, one where he thinks it is perfectly fine to imprison people who hold different opinions to him.

He happened to pick the right side of the COVID nonsense, but his views on imprisoning people he does not agree with shows that he is unsuitable for any public office.