...after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June expanding gun rights.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
(((apnews)))
“I’m a gun owner. I enjoy my guns often, but I enjoyed the right to have those guns and to use them responsibly,” Democratic Assembly member and bill sponsor Joe Danielsen said. “This bill provides zero conflict.”
“This bill provides zero conflict.”
Yet you are attempting to require insurance for having a gun in public. That would be an infringement. I can't afford insurance, I spent all of my money on guns and bullets.
>...after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June expanding gun rights.
#**REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE**
(((apnews)))
>“I’m a gun owner. I enjoy my guns often, but I enjoyed the right to have those guns and to use them responsibly,” Democratic Assembly member and bill sponsor Joe Danielsen said. “This bill provides zero conflict.”
>>“This bill provides zero conflict.”
Yet you are attempting to require insurance for having a gun in public. That would be an infringement. I can't afford insurance, I spent all of my money on guns and bullets.
(post is archived)