WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

584

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I would be fully on board with this.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

As I said below, if you feed the beast it wins (pay taxes/consume) and if you're fed by the beast it wins (welfare, public schools)

And amish, correct me if I'm wrong, are among those offering the least exposure to the system/beast; they barely consume, they pay taxes at minima and they're self sufficient they even kind of escape the electronic mass surveillance by just not being there, on the networks

The key here is "non participation", and their model is viable, at least it seems...

And I think it should be emulated because the only winning move is to not participate, starve the beast. And when the regime collapses well you don't give much of fuck you live in parallel already, you barely need the regime for anything, it's more of a parasite than anything else in the end, so good fucking riddance

[–] 2 pts (edited )

I think the key thing about the Amish is the family first concept, no interpreting, living off of the land and being independent. Definitely the ideal lifestyle.

Edit- I reread this and what I meant by no interpreting is that if you don't speak the language of the land you are in it's only semi acceptable if you are passing through or visiting. Knowing and speaking the language of a country should be MANDATORY if you want to live there. Talk about being a rude fuck. Learn the official language or get out.

How come White Europeans don't move to Somalia and speak English? Pretty simple. We don't move to shitholes. Stay home. Where YOU belong.