Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

While I am not an attorney and cannot give formal legal advice, a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Murdock v. Pennsylvania, may give Second Amendment–supporters an overwhelming legal weapon with which to destroy every single firearm ownership (although not necessarily concealed carry) licensing scheme in the country. This includes those that require licenses to own or purchase firearms.

> While I am not an attorney and cannot give formal legal advice, a *1943 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Murdock v. Pennsylvania*, may give Second Amendment–supporters an overwhelming legal weapon with which to destroy every single firearm ownership (although not necessarily concealed carry) licensing scheme in the country. This includes those that require licenses to own or purchase firearms.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 3 pts

You think NJ is gonna care, or NYC? Has this ruling stopped any of these commie states from trampling on your rights?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Of course not. They'll jew their way out of it by calling them "processing/convenience fees", if they don't already call them that.

[–] • 1 pt

Remember NYC got around rent control by issuing insane key transfer fees. The apartment was 1500/month, but the delivery fee for the key was 5000$. same thing will happen here