Ok, let me break it down for your dumb punk-bitch ass. It is not a matter of faith. It is a matter of FACT. Who the fuck are you to tell me? Have you held a secret security clearance? Have you accessed classified information? You have no idea what I know. Secondly, you have no fucking idea what you are talking about. Proof requires research. The proof is out there for those who are not blind. However, it requires somebody with the ability to discern real facts vs brainwashing propaganda. Clearly, you do not qualify. You say Q is full of shit because the truth is, you are a fucking coward and can't face reality.
Evidence or GTFO.
Proof requires research. Do I look like your fucking secretary? How about you get off you lazy fucking ass and go find the evidence yourself? Oh that's right, I'm sorry, I mistook you for someone with half a brain.
Firstly, his name itself. "Q", after the Department of Energy's Q clearance. I have had the opportunity to work in our country's national labs, and have worked with some of those clever, hard-working folks that hold Q clearance. A Q clearance grants access to carefully compartmentalized nuclear weapons information. One who holds a Q clearance is a scientist, engineer, or manager who is deemed trustworthy by classifying authorities. Q clearance holders are people who employ our nation's most dangerous technical secrets to manufacture and maintain weaponry than can end the world in a flash of baleful fire.
They are not experts in spycraft and combat operations.
If, for some curious reason, our President put a Q clearance individual in charge of such an operation, it is not believable that anyone would issue commands and share national security information with strangers via a cobbled-together web site of uncertain security...particularly if said website's claim to fame was a loud public argument about about video games.
If that catastrophic chain of events were to take place somehow, this nuclear/black ops guru would not stoop so low as to secure this essential line of communication with a DES/crypt(3) based tripcode hash, with the excuse that it is necessary in order to maintain portability between 4chan-style image boards. This is not a concern of a serious man. Plus, DES has been considered extremely insecure for a quarter-century and can be cracked in hours on commodity hardware, as has been demonstrated here. That presumptive hero would, under no circumstances, embed an insult and a lie into that very cryptographic signature (see technical discussion that follows for details).
The person who would do that is not a patriot, not an operator, and not a hero. This person is a vain child.
It is hard as hell for me to admit when I've been fooled. I have been in that place. It is humiliating.
Is this why you're so triggered right now? You tell me it's a matter of fact and not faith, yet you ask me to blindly trust you about Q. You have to prove your claims in an argument. Don't let Q think for you.
(post is archived)