Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

159

Once section 230 is abolished or changed, I suspect a MsM+Big Tech blackout will occur.

They are in DEEP with censorship and China's 50-cent cohorts, they'll have to blackout comms to avoid any litigation from people after the changes take effect.

Zuck the cuck knows FB will have to go down, they've got a waterfall of information being held back. Twitter too All MSM.

Since Google operates a lot of the internet servers (900,000+) and Google themselves are involved in massive information suppression operations...Google will shut the servers off to allow for the techs to make the necessary changes and algorithm deletions.

Thoughts?

Once section 230 is abolished or changed, I suspect a MsM+Big Tech blackout will occur. They are in DEEP with censorship and China's 50-cent cohorts, they'll have to blackout comms to avoid any litigation from people after the changes take effect. Zuck the cuck knows FB will have to go down, they've got a waterfall of information being held back. Twitter too All MSM. Since Google operates a lot of the internet servers (900,000+) and Google themselves are involved in massive information suppression operations...Google will shut the servers off to allow for the techs to make the necessary changes and algorithm deletions. Thoughts?

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Section 230 will not be removed unless scotus gets a case and rules that they are behaving as publishers therefore section 230 doesn't apply to the. Big tech owns too many politicians.

[–] • 0 pt

Voat Great Awakening Refugees READ!!!!

Here is the back up site for Voat Great Awakening:

https://poal.co/s/QStorm/new

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The problem with section 230 isn't the law itself, but how the courts chose to interpret it. The intent of the law was to give immunity for providers for removing illegal content.

There is no reason to think that the same won't happen to whatever law replaces it.