WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

100

“It would behoove the police to not violate their oath of office and uphold the constitutional rights they swore an oath to uphold,” Weaver wrote.

> “It would behoove the police to not violate their oath of office and uphold the constitutional rights they swore an oath to uphold,” Weaver wrote.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

With all the US police training by the IDF shouldn’t they be registered as foreign agents?

[–] 3 pts (edited )

Step 1) mount a half-assed legal defense Step 2) submit flawed appeals that aren't heard or are thrown out on technicalities Step 3) congratulations, your first amendment rights were just repealed and jackboots now come to your door if you say or write something that hurts jews' feelings, just like in almost all of Europe

That's the likely end game here. It's already happened in Florida, and I don't see GDL appealing shit there, do you?

Time will tell if I am right.

[–] 2 pts

I don't see any crimes there. The fact police are involved at all screams of intimidation and tyranny.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

I'm not willing to bet my first amendment rights on "GDL's" legal team, if that even exists.

I think this is a ploy to make speech that offends jews illegal.

When they successfully fight and overturn the bullshit that was passed in Florida, I might change my mind, but they haven't done that, have they? Those bullshit felony littering rules are still on the books. What has GDL done to undo that damage?

You guys are being fucking stupid for not considering the possibility that GDL is controlled opposition.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

You guys are being fucking stupid

Not sure why you use that phrasing given I repeatedly stated I'm willing to support this line of discussion and thinking. That said, this type of opposition is also how you fight it in court. What options are there? What alternative path is there to not only strike down these blatantly unconstitutional laws but to expose what Jews are collectively doing?

Since HT has stopped eeking and ooking for bad optics I'm willing to consider he may be legit. That said, like you, I'm hesitant to trust because historically all of the popular natso movements are (((FBI))) or Mossad controlled. Ignoring the fact that I'm not natso. Accordingly, I fully acknowledge, and have done so in the past, your very point and very legitimate reasons, do support your position. It's not unreasonable.

I too wonder about his funding. I'm not convinced there is enough of a money stream to support him and his gang.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I too wonder about his funding. I'm not convinced there is enough of a money stream to support him and his gang.

Um, funding to do what ?. He sits in front of a computer screen streaming and every 2nd or 3rd month they jump in a van and go riding around and drop banners. Their probably have similar expenses to a college student drinking booze on a long weekend and paying subs for some sports team t shirt. I can see the whole operation dribble along solely on online donations/ merch and his dozen or so cohorts chipping in a few bucks each month for gas and thc vape cartridges.