devs that want to require the safety stuff
The article does mention what devs want but they are part of the problem. Candy Crush knows how many dogs you have, where the sofa is, and when your GF is on the rag.
It's like trusted computing. It is you they do not trust, and it is their "safety" they will preserve. By safety they probably mean reduced rework when people disable an Android misfeature.
>devs that want to require the safety stuff
The article does mention what devs want but they are part of the problem. Candy Crush knows how many dogs you have, where the sofa is, and when your GF is on the rag.
It's like trusted computing. It is you they do not trust, and it is their "safety" they will preserve. By safety they probably mean reduced rework when people disable an Android misfeature.
Absolutely. I have an old Alcatel that has "kai os" but it aint joogle. I'll use that pos before I'll pay a grand for a mobile that I'm a slave to.
Absolutely. I have an old Alcatel that has "kai os" but it aint joogle. I'll use that pos before I'll pay a grand for a mobile that I'm a slave to.