After they discover the sun, they will discover water (and waters' role in maintaining the climate of Earth through a variable and non-linear feedback effect. I.e. at lower temps, water helps to warm the planet, at higher temps it helps to cool.). Most of the supposed warming from CO2 increases of the alarmists is a result of their assumed positive and fixed feedback of water vapor in the atmosphere, which is required to amplify the very small, and almost saturated, IR absorption of CO2. But, in reality, the feedback is not always positive and is not a fixed value and behaves in a non-linear manner, e.g. as ocean surface temperatures approach 30 degrees Celsius, the feedback turns strongly negative due to the formation of massive tropical thunderstorms and squall lines (groups of thunderstorms), which act like huge refrigerators, pumping the heat from the ocean surface to the top of the atmosphere where it is radiated out into space, thus cooling the planet. Warm humid air containing much heat energy (both it's temperature and the specific heat of vaporization) is transported upwards (since water vapor is lighter than the rest of the atmosphere). Once it reaches the top of the Troposphere, it spreads out, cools and condenses (releasing the energy that it held as IR radiation). This radiation, which is emitted at the top of the Troposphere is much more easily transmitted out into space. All that additional CO2 can do is marginally slow down the transmission.
The Sun, and variations in the Earths' orbit around it drive the longer term climate variations... Ice ages, Climate optima, etc. Water, in all its forms, controls the short and medium term variations. Water is pretty fucking amazing, were any of a huge number of it's properties different, the planet would likely be uninhabitable. E.g. It is lighter as a solid than it is as a liquid. This causes ice to float. If that were different, ice would sink and the ocean would slowly freeze from the bottom up as it filled up with ice from the poles. As a gas it is lighter than the rest of the atmosphere. If this were different, water vapor would hover around at ground level and its main effect would be to regularly suffocate any life that required oxygen to live (similar to CO2 emissions from some lakes that cause mass wildlife die offs).
In reality, they will discover nothing, because they are not interested in discovering anything, the "Climate Emergency" nonsense is just FEAR based propaganda aimed at taking control of the lives (and deaths) of the vast majority of the planets' population so that a small group of "elites" (filthy fucking jews mostly) can lord it over the remainder. It's always been that way, and COVID was the same game, just played out over a much shorter time span. These people are not scientists and they are not conducting science.
Great comment. Cheers.
, the "Climate Emergency" nonsense is just FEAR based propaganda aimed at taking control of the lives (and deaths) of the vast majority of the planets' population so that a small group of "elites" (filthy fucking jews mostly) can lord it over the remainder. It's always been that way, and COVID was the same game, just played out over a much shorter time span.
something that is legitimate, but opportunistically hijacked for political gain, shouldn't be dismissed for exactly the same politically advantageous reasons. Like with Covid, if we had done nothing, people would have died. With climate change, if we do nothing, everyone dies
Doing something is a more reasonable approach. Whether you think that's ivermectin or some new vaccine technology, it doesn't matter, but doing something pragmatically useful is usually better than telling everyone else they are wrong.
I think it's reasonable to switch a bunch of transport to something less polluting, I don't care if that's H2, LPG, biofuel or electric. If we could have done that over a few decades then all this would have been vastly less painful, but that would have required politicians to have started agreeing on this approach back in 1896 when Svante Arrhenius first noticed something was going on with CO2 Or a hundred years later when literally everyone with a test tube realised something was going wrong. Or twenty years ago when stuff like the Prius appeared and made commuter hybrid transport viable
We've have multiple opportunities to not shoot ourselves in the face over this issue, if you are still listening to dumbfuck politicians at this point then that's on you
Letting politicians decide what is true or not is a really dumb way to run any civilisation, their job is to stay in their lane and decide which actions are reasonable and sustainable. Transport is going to be carbon neutral eventually because it's just better. And we wouldn't be in this mess if politicians hadn't wasted trillions on sand nigger wars instead of getting fusion working
These people are not scientists and they are not conducting science.
well they are, you are just choosing to disagree based on your more limited knowledge and an ideological position, which is a dangerous hill to die on. A bit like muslims continuing to marry their immediate cousins
(post is archived)