German Physicist: Human CO2 Emissions Responsible For 0.05°C Of The Global Warming Since 1750

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 0 pt

, the "Climate Emergency" nonsense is just FEAR based propaganda aimed at taking control of the lives (and deaths) of the vast majority of the planets' population so that a small group of "elites" (filthy fucking jews mostly) can lord it over the remainder. It's always been that way, and COVID was the same game, just played out over a much shorter time span.

something that is legitimate, but opportunistically hijacked for political gain, shouldn't be dismissed for exactly the same politically advantageous reasons. Like with Covid, if we had done nothing, people would have died. With climate change, if we do nothing, everyone dies

Doing something is a more reasonable approach. Whether you think that's ivermectin or some new vaccine technology, it doesn't matter, but doing something pragmatically useful is usually better than telling everyone else they are wrong.

I think it's reasonable to switch a bunch of transport to something less polluting, I don't care if that's H2, LPG, biofuel or electric. If we could have done that over a few decades then all this would have been vastly less painful, but that would have required politicians to have started agreeing on this approach back in 1896 when Svante Arrhenius first noticed something was going on with CO2 Or a hundred years later when literally everyone with a test tube realised something was going wrong. Or twenty years ago when stuff like the Prius appeared and made commuter hybrid transport viable

We've have multiple opportunities to not shoot ourselves in the face over this issue, if you are still listening to dumbfuck politicians at this point then that's on you

Letting politicians decide what is true or not is a really dumb way to run any civilisation, their job is to stay in their lane and decide which actions are reasonable and sustainable. Transport is going to be carbon neutral eventually because it's just better. And we wouldn't be in this mess if politicians hadn't wasted trillions on sand nigger wars instead of getting fusion working

These people are not scientists and they are not conducting science.

well they are, you are just choosing to disagree based on your more limited knowledge and an ideological position, which is a dangerous hill to die on. A bit like muslims continuing to marry their immediate cousins

>, the "Climate Emergency" nonsense is just FEAR based propaganda aimed at taking control of the lives (and deaths) of the vast majority of the planets' population so that a small group of "elites" (filthy fucking jews mostly) can lord it over the remainder. It's always been that way, and COVID was the same game, just played out over a much shorter time span. something that is legitimate, but opportunistically hijacked for political gain, shouldn't be dismissed for exactly the same politically advantageous reasons. Like with Covid, if we had done nothing, people would have died. With climate change, if we do nothing, everyone dies Doing something is a more reasonable approach. Whether you think that's ivermectin or some new vaccine technology, it doesn't matter, but doing something pragmatically useful is usually better than telling everyone else they are wrong. I think it's reasonable to switch a bunch of transport to something less polluting, I don't care if that's H2, LPG, biofuel or electric. If we could have done that over a few decades then all this would have been vastly less painful, but that would have required politicians to have started agreeing on this approach back in 1896 when Svante Arrhenius first noticed something was going on with CO2 Or a hundred years later when literally everyone with a test tube realised something was going wrong. Or twenty years ago when stuff like the Prius appeared and made commuter hybrid transport viable We've have multiple opportunities to not shoot ourselves in the face over this issue, if you are still listening to dumbfuck politicians at this point then that's on you Letting politicians decide what is true or not is a really dumb way to run any civilisation, their job is to stay in their lane and decide which actions are reasonable and sustainable. Transport is going to be carbon neutral eventually because it's just better. And we wouldn't be in this mess if politicians hadn't wasted trillions on sand nigger wars instead of getting fusion working >These people are not scientists and they are not conducting science. well they are, you are just choosing to disagree based on your more limited knowledge and an ideological position, which is a dangerous hill to die on. A bit like muslims continuing to marry their immediate cousins

parent
link