Total bullshit charts. No way for that data to exist since they didn't even have thermometer's a hundred years ago so no way they can take a reading. Just wild guesses to rationalize a viewpoint they decided and or that they can profit from an expensive study they will use new bullshit to validate that new study leading to another 20 year study that costs millions they can fake also like climate change studies or other garbage they change the data to work so their income only increases for creating more bullshit theories.
>No way for that data to exist since they didn't even have thermometer's a hundred years
First of all, what have thermometers anything to do with that chart?
The chart starts at 1970 btw
Now what? They didn't have thermometers in 1970? What are you a fucking tardinial? What's your stupid point here dumbo?
Man I must have been tired when I wrote that. I do know what I was thinking though. That the chances of a full magnetic field honest mapping would be honestly unlikely. So many things have been done in the past using layers of sediment and shit to guess what the field should be in that era.
I know the field is fucked up and that likely happens just like the weather having cycles and we can't blame us since it would also likely happen if we were living in caves primitively.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_magnetic_field#Measurement_and_analysis
>The Earth's magnetic field strength was measured by Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1832[64]
...
Pretty sure when the magnetic field will reach a critically low level, something dramatic will happen, regarding "the climate". Well regarding everything, climate included, this can't be of no consequence whatsoever
And of course there's nothing we can do about it, it's like that
Now idk what would be that critically low level, so I can't estimate the time left
(post is archived)