They'll leave those men out there, screaming in agony as they die.
You know not what you speak of. Please shut the fuck up on all things military related. There are many reasons not to have women in combat. You had to pick the dumbest.
What? I'll speak about whatever I'd like. Strike a nerve with you? Or you're trying to tell me that the military really practices "No man left behind, ever" that they preach? Because that is bullshit. Men get killed and their bodies can't be reached sometimes without getting other men killed.
Point is that men will put themselves in extra danger when there are women involved in a combat situation, and they're usually a distraction and hindrance rather than valuable members of the team.
You can obviously say anything you want. Just like now. You just make it up and go because it feels good and that's how you see it so you can't be wrong. Well guess what? You are wrong and extra stupud about it too.
You did make a good point about girls fucking shit up, but your portrayal of how the military operates with dead soldiers is laughable. Your ignorance really shines. Take a guess on when the last time an Americans body wasn't recovered. You just don't have a fucking clue the amount of effort that happens to not leave another man behind. You wouldn't even believe it if you saw it. You would be speechless. Now do you know why I call you an idiot.
You're reading into my hypothetical scenario far, far too much. I do understand the lengths the military goes to in order to recover POWs and KIA men. I am emphasizing how greatly the presence of women on the battlefield effects this.
The lengths/attention female POWs/MIAs get are far greater than most men, even though there's been like a handful of them since 2001. This means the military is using/risking/losing more resources/men in order to try and recover/babysit/ their least effective assets. I'm talking hypothetical war theory here, stop being so serious.
(post is archived)