@StupidBird - comments? >. . . “The more I learn about John James Audubon, the more I’m convinced that keeping that name is a hindrance to our growing and going forward and being more inclusive,” he told Planet Detroit. >Bull’s conviction stems from a brewing controversy within the National Audubon Society and the larger conservation movement as it reckons with the legacy of its founders – many of whom were white men with racist and colonialist views. . . [Source Article](https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-environment-watch/michigan-audubon-chapters-question-future-amid-debate-about-racist)