WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

258

And they fail to state just why the algorithm is racist. Shucks

And they fail to state just why the algorithm is racist. Shucks

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

Kim believes that this racial bias in video game hair stems from Computer Graphics Researchers that have “historically favored the simulation and rendering of straight hair, which is racially coded as European or Caucasian hair.”

I would say that nigger women themselves have "historically favored the simulation of straight hair," which is coded as European or Caucasian or Asian or Native American or Desi or any other type of hair belonging to actual human beings, as opposed to burr-headed monkey-men.

[–] 2 pts

I love how the fucking bug-eating asian says "..which is racially coded as European or Caucasian hair". Really motherfucker?? Show me an asian with a fucking afro. If any race is "coded" as having only straight hair, its asians.

This may be the dumbest grant yet. All it takes to deny this faggot's presumptions is to simply look at screenshots of random games, which will overwhelmingly show that hair on non-whites look fine. You don't need a million dollars for that.

From a mahematical perspective, it's easier to ray trace a straight line, than it is a curve, since it requires less computation power. Going from A ->B is easy, however A->B with a few vertices thrown in becomes much harder. This is even made harder when you factor in animations, and prefabs, meshes, etc. But no, it's gotta be racism ...

[–] 1 pt

Kim believes that this racial bias in video game hair stems from Computer Graphics Researchers that have “historically favored the simulation and rendering of straight hair, which is racially coded as European or Caucasian hair.”

Or Asian hair, or Native American hair, or Latin American hair, or Indian hair ...