That's pretty weird.
What poignant elements of that game caused it to be so controversial? I know nothing of the game.
Edit - Found speculation on what the real reason might be on the Kotaku article's comment section. Hint: legal reasons because they were acquired and previous board game acquisition language does not permit transference of this IP to the new parent company:
Read my fucking title.
Don't be a fag. Your title makes a statement, and includes no facts.
The game also promotes the vaccine as a cure and one strategy for winning involves getting it to a Lotta people before the virus mutates.
Yes, it's a real vaccine, not mRNA shit. Illiterate imbecile.
you're a fucking retard OP.
Your fucking conclusion is no where in the article. Nor do I read your fucking conclusion anywhere else on the fucking internet about this fucking situation. You also do not provide a fucking thesis or fucking supporting evidence for your fucking conclusion in the fucking title. Your fucking response is fucking useless and does not address my fucking question at all and I'm still left fucking wondering what the fuck is going on in this fucking situation.
Fuck.
(post is archived)