The irony is that years ago there was already a competent service called Onlive and it was better than stadia in every possible metric. Now that more people have access to greater internet performance, they were met with Stadia which sought to undermine everything that gave Onlive potential.
As convenient as your argument is, it remains rooted in the idea that we never physically own anything we buy anymore and much like Onlive, anything that you have purchased disappears when the company dies off.
Most games are heavily online anyway, and a game in that capacity could not even be ran by the normal user. In any case, I wouldn't mind paying a subscription to be able to play something like that.
It's not like smaller single play games would disappear in that world -- you can have both.
(post is archived)