WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

No one ever says the game play or combat is good, and if they did they'd be so easily defeated in that debate that they wouldn't last long. the story belongs in the trash bin, as it completely ruins the 1899 western theme. crafting is so tedious just fuck it.

so yeah, it's graphicsfags. don't pay for this game, it's not even worth playing for free. unless you want a neat walking simulator, apparently.

No one ever says the game play or combat is good, and if they did they'd be so easily defeated in that debate that they wouldn't last long. the story belongs in the trash bin, as it completely ruins the 1899 western theme. crafting is so tedious just fuck it. so yeah, it's graphicsfags. don't pay for this game, it's not even worth playing for free. unless you want a neat walking simulator, apparently.

(post is archived)

I knew the fucking leader of the gang was a POS about two missions into the game and so it infuriated me that I couldn't plug that fucker and instead has to keep following his fucked plans continually. I never played RDR1 {fuck consoles and controllers} so I knew nothing about these characters but I knew that fuck was rotten.

[–] 1 pt

you can play it in an emulator, and the emulators for ps3 and xbox are pretty well done now, from what I've been told by several sources. one video said the ps emulator wasn't quite good enough, but everyone else said it was good, however that could be another case of people who wish to identify themselves with computers saying they fully tested something they didn't (this trend started back in 2013)