WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

on what, they are giving refunds if people dont like it and they acknowledge their mistake, what did they do that is more bad than releasing a bad game.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Even if everyone got their refund (which I doubt) they still got million of pre-orders (ie. interest free loans) based on lies, it's also unfair to competitors, e.g. EA could outspend smaller studios with bullshit marketing which leads to less people would buying the "inferior" product. EA could take a reputational hit as long as long as it's reducing competition.

[–] 0 pt

that makes no sense, it wasnt about preorders and its not like other companys have done it, Activation, EA, Valve, Ubsoft and Microsoft all have history of releasing glitch/broken games. Nothing has change, no one got the upperhand and no one gain anything. Indie games are also guilty of the same acts, they are often more fill with glitch or soft-lock gameplay, indiegames are no different than AAA.

[–] 0 pt

it wasnt about preorders

it's a publicly traded company, those numbers matter to them.

Activation, EA, Valve, Ubsoft and Microsoft all have history of releasing glitch/broken games

cyberpunk has to be the biggest fuckup, i can't even think of another release that comes close, like half the content is cut and is unplayable on console.

Indie games are also guilty of the same acts

two wrongs don't make a right