>I thought you had meant the 320x244 stuff was being doubled to 640x480.
Well it should be while keeping aspect ratio, at least that 's what I thought it did, until I realize while writing this that it probably goes the other way around since pixels are barely visible/don't look doubled...
>>I thought you had meant the 320x244 stuff was being doubled to 640x480.
Well it should be while keeping aspect ratio, at least that 's what I thought it did, until I realize while writing this that it probably goes the other way around since pixels are barely visible/don't look doubled...
(post is archived)